julian-fietkau.de

t is again last week and I am back with the current status. For all those who may have missed: Last Saturday it was out of rhythm a Special Report on the Organizational. The interviews are unfortunately not new, rather I would like to present to you today my draft outline.

Outline

For the construction of a scientific work, there are known to be some conventions. Thus, usually set up (after an introduction) a theory, then experiments are described and evaluated and modified the theory that disproved or substantiated. For more conceptual works - like mine - is at the beginning rather a definition that is then tested individually inspected and, if possible.

In this sense, I have a proposal for structuring my work. The names and terms are not final and will only partially meet the chapter titles, but I hope we can thus see what is to happen in what order:

• Introduction
  • The idea teachlet
• Definition
  • Definition according to [Schmolitzky2005] and their limits
  • Updated Definition
• What forms can take teachlet?
  • Examples of exceptional teachlet
• How were teachlet done so far?
  • Reports of teachlet Moderators
• What are promising new ideas?
• What is a teachlet makes it a good teachlet?
• Summary

In light of the current development (and elsewhere) I should start running text on paper, ie bring to a keyboard. They say you write the introduction first, then write the rest of the work, and then write the introduction once more again. In that spirit, I'll probably start with the introduction and the chapter on definition (which is indeed already been revised).

As always, I wish to outline feedback. If you see or weaknesses may dwell a little better when it is otherwise resolved, always out with it.

Participation

What would also be interested to know of you: How you would like to pursue this body texts in their creation? Around the formulation of such an introduction, I ask myself as rather boring to watch before. Is there interest here to read preliminary versions of the chapter? Who of you would give me feedback on it then? Or is it rather something that I can save me now? Your opinion interests me.

By the way: I do not log IPs and have no visitors statistics. However, I am now been approached by so many of you ("Hey, you're of the blog and the bachelor thesis!") that I know that you are there. Axel, my supervisor met my experiments with the public with a healthy dash of skepticism. So if you want me to motivate me with my reports continue to give trouble, then writes it like a short comment. Not everyone has to like this make me more content, even a "Hey, I read with every week and think it's cool" I would look forward to. So who has not yet been streamlined: The comment field does not bite, it's all without an account and register, and mail and such crap. Most recently, there is even a little formatting help under the comment box, but only on the very edge. So: Bring to the comments!

Outlook

By next Tuesday I will have something resolved because of the interviews. Either there are a few dates, or the thing falls flat. But as I just preemptively for the next month, all others have been canceled, I'm really happy. I have to reach people so just yet.

In my planning in addition to the interviews, no further data collection is planned. That is, the rest is creative writing. Until next week so I'll throw in LaTeX and writing my fingers sore. Until then!